The current issue of the Saint Paul Legal Ledger (article not online) offers a short profile of a state representative, who asks an interesting question:
It wouldn't be the first time that tax policy is based on outmoded ways of thinking. DeLaForest, by the way, is not a soak-the-rich guy. He's won plaudits from the Taxpayers League of Minnesota for his low-tax record.Chris DeLaForest (49A) has been thinking a lot lately about taxes and asks a disarmingly simple question: Why does the state tax property?
He paints a hypothetical scenario about a blue collar couple living on 20 acres they bought two decades ago .... The property is worth at least $2 million, making the taxes unaffordable to a family of modest means.
'I wonder if Minnesota just shouldn't stop taxing property,' he says. 'Property taxation is absolutely divorced from the notion that a person should pay taxes in some relationship to their wealth. Seeing property as a proxy for wealth comes from an agrarian society that doesn't exist anymore.